Bring shop-floor signals, business data, and collaboration records into one traceable event. A digital worker watches, organizes evidence, drafts a candidate analysis, and routes the next step to the right person.
Defined responsibilities · Evidence-backed findings · Approval for high-risk actions
3 linked evidence items · Engineer review neededBuilt from linked evidence · status updates continuously
Connect authorized sources and organize evidence around the same station, equipment, and time window. Keep source and timestamp with every event record.
Equipment state, line stoppage, and shop-floor scenes.
Cameras / image clipsOperator reports, anomaly descriptions, and handoffs.
Voice input / transcriptIssue reports and resolution updates in production channels.
Message / people / timeWork orders, quality gates, cold-test, and equipment APIs.
System events / metricsFrom shop-floor capture to human approval, organize data, models, and execution permissions by deployment boundary. Every layer keeps a traceable state.
Bring real production state into the event chain
Filter and validate before building context
Create one factual surface for each event
Draft candidates without replacing expert judgment
Give tasks, notifications, and writes clear boundaries
Query authorized data and status
Prepare drafts under configuration
Broadcast, control, or critical change
Each step shows the information used and the result produced. Missing evidence is called out instead of presenting an inference as fact.
A quality alert, equipment state change, or operator report opens an event.
Related system and collaboration records are gathered by station, equipment, and time.
Process rules and history inform candidate causes and items to verify.
Generate a report or task; request approval for broadcasts, writes, and other actions.
Configure the digital worker as an operational role with clear duties, triggers, deliverables, and escalation rules.
Monitors production signals, assembles context, and coordinates follow-up without replacing on-site safety judgment or professional sign-off.
State change / schedule
Live or rule-based
Anomaly event and evidence trail
Route line stoppage or safety risk to the duty lead
Equipment alert / patrol cycle
By equipment policy
Equipment status summary
Request human input when key data is missing
Shift end / before review
Daily
Anomaly list and briefing material
Flag unresolved items with owners and status
Show sources, original information, and system records in time order. Candidate causes and open questions remain reviewable before an authorized person confirms action.
Work order MO-8821 · Station A-07
Source: Final Assembly shift channel
Linked to the same station and time window
Based on 3 evidence items · Under review
Supported by the quality gate record, team report, and voice note; on-site verification is still required.
Check locating pins and clamp state; resume only after on-site confirmation.
Review fixture inspection intervals and recent maintenance history.
Add similar quality-gate signals to trend monitoring rules.
Manage data sources, model endpoints, and action scope under enterprise deployment policies. Give tools only the permissions they need.
Query authorized equipment, work-order, and quality data.
Prepare reports, summaries, or task drafts.
Chat messages, voice broadcasts, or cross-team notices.
Equipment control, production-state writes, or critical changes.
Agree on the current baseline first, then track the time and quality of anomaly resolution. These are evaluation dimensions, not promised outcomes.
Equipment state / team report
Confirmed cause and maintenance task
MES / anomaly register
Traceable shift-level issue list
Quality gate / chat / cold test
Shared owner and disposition status
Pilot results depend on the customer baseline and mutually agreed measurement rules; no general performance or financial outcome is implied.
Choose a station, quality gate, or MES event to define the evidence sources, approval boundaries, and reviewable pilot measures together.